Advantage and disadvantage of qualitative research

Mary Dowd Selecting the best research method allows you to successfully answer a research question or test a hypothesis.

Advantage and disadvantage of qualitative research

Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Social Marketing Research by Nedra Kline Weinreich Introduction Traditionally, research in the field of health promotion has followed in the footsteps of its "older brother," medicine.

However, the reductionistic model of disease causation cannot adequately describe the complex mechanisms that influence health behavior.

23 Advantages and Disadvantages of Qualitative Research |

Social marketers working to promote health have learned that rigorous quantitative research surveys do not necessarily provide all of the data needed to develop effective communications. Consequently, qualitative methods such as focus groups and in-depth interviews, as well as less precise but useful semi-quantitative approaches, such as intercept surveys, have emerged as part of their research repertoire.

In an ideal social marketing program, researchers use both quantitative Advantage and disadvantage of qualitative research qualitative data to provide a more complete picture of the issue being addressed, the target audience and the effectiveness of the program itself.

Advantage and disadvantage of qualitative research

The purpose of this paper is to look at how these two different research approaches can be integrated to inform the development of an effective social marketing program.

Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Comparison An examination of the quantitative and qualitative paradigms will help to identify their strengths and weaknesses and how their divergent approaches can complement each other.

In most cases, researchers fall into one of the two camps--either relying exclusively upon "objective" survey questionnaires and statistical analyses and eschewing warm and fuzzy qualitative methods, or using only qualitative methodologies, rejecting the quantitative approach as decontextualizing human behavior.

However, social marketing researchers recognize that each approach has positive attributes, and that combining different methods can result in gaining the best of both research worlds.

Quantitative research uses methods adopted from the physical sciences that are designed to ensure objectivity, generalizability and reliability. These techniques cover the ways research participants are selected randomly from the study population in an unbiased manner, the standardized questionnaire or intervention they receive and the statistical methods used to test predetermined hypotheses regarding the relationships between specific variables.

The researcher is considered external to the actual research, and results are expected to be replicable no matter who conducts the research. The strengths of the quantitative paradigm are that its methods produce quantifiable, reliable data that are usually generalizable to some larger population.

Quantitative measures are often most appropriate for conducting needs assessments or for evaluations comparing outcomes with baseline data. This paradigm breaks down when the phenomenon under study is difficult to measure or quantify.

The greatest weakness of the quantitative approach is that it decontextualizes human behavior in a way that removes the event from its real world setting and ignores the effects of variables that have not been included in the model.

Qualitative research methodologies are designed to provide the researcher with the perspective of target audience members through immersion in a culture or situation and direct interaction with the people under study.

Educational inequality - Wikipedia

Qualitative methods used in social marketing include observations, in-depth interviews and focus groups.

These methods are designed to help researchers understand the meanings people assign to social phenomena and to elucidate the mental processes underlying behaviors. Hypotheses are generated during data collection and analysis, and measurement tends to be subjective.

In the qualitative paradigm, the researcher becomes the instrument of data collection, and results may vary greatly depending upon who conducts the research.

The advantage of using qualitative methods is that they generate rich, detailed data that leave the participants' perspectives intact and provide a context for health behavior.

The focus upon processes and "reasons why" differs from that of quantitative research, which addresses correlations between variables. A disadvantage is that data collection and analysis may be labor intensive and time-consuming.

In addition, these methods are not yet totally accepted by the mainstream public health community and qualitative researchers may find their results challenged as invalid by those outside the field of social marketing.

Social Marketing Research The traditional health promotion professional conducts research at the beginning of a project to develop an intervention, and again at the end to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. In contrast, social marketers utilize research throughout the planning, development, implementation and evaluation phases of the program; social marketing is a process of continuous development and testing.

Component 1 examination Component 1 examination • The content for AS and A level is the same. • The A level paper is greater overall in assessment difficulty. • AS level – . Advantages of Qualitative Research • Issues and subjects covered can be evaluated in depth and in detail. • Interviews are not limited to particular questions and can be redirected or guided by researchers in real time. The art of Head Start: Intensive arts integration associated with advantage in school readiness for economically disadvantaged children ☆.

Many of the tools used to develop social marketing programs--focus groups, consumer marketing databases, intercept surveys--have their origins in the field of commercial market research, and are based on "what works" for gathering various types of needed data.

Social marketing relies upon consumer-focused research to learn as much about the target audience as possible by looking at their lives from many different angles--both quantitatively as part of a larger group and qualitatively to investigate individual attitudes, reactions, behaviors and preferences.Selecting the best research method allows you to successfully answer a research question or test a hypothesis.

Missteps at the onset of the research process may derail an otherwise promising study. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative and qualitative methods will help you make a. In qualitative research, the methods most commonly used are; qualitative case study, ethnography, content analysis and action research.

There are many advantages and disadvantages of using a qualitative research when investigating our social world. Most people view the world as consisting of a large number of alternatives. Futures research evolved as a way of examining the alternative futures and identifying the most probable.

Advantage and disadvantage of qualitative research

Travel timeTravel time is simultaneously considered an advantage and disadvantage of buses and is an important reason for mode choice. In areas with exclusive bus lanes, and to travel to the city centre, the bus is considered faster than the car, mostly by public transport users.

Air conditioning (often referred to as AC, A/C, or air con) is the process of removing heat and moisture from the interior of an occupied space, to improve the comfort of occupants. Air conditioning can be used in both domestic and commercial environments. This process is most commonly used to achieve a more comfortable interior environment, typically for humans and animals; however, air.

European Journal of Business and Innovation Research Vol. 1, No. 3, pp, September Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK, (

Advantages & Disadvantages of Qualitative & Quantitative Research | The Classroom